Beyond Naval Interventions In Somali Piracy – Analysis
By Joana Ama Osei-Tutu*
In 2011, at the height of piracy attacks along the Somali coastline and the Gulf of Aden, 237 separateattacks were reported. This figure has fallen drastically over the years, with only 12 attacks being reported in 2014. This decline has been attributed to the collective efforts of the international community to address Somali piracy.
A major aspect of the counter-piracy efforts was the military operations carried out since 2008, particularly through the European Union Naval Force Operation ATALANTA and the Operation Ocean Shield mounted by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. The multinational naval presence served as the main deterrent against maritime piracy in the Gulf of Aden. These efforts were accompanied by a multitude of protection mechanisms employed by the shipping industry, including the hiring of armed personnel to accompany vessels as they transited through the Gulf of Aden. Efforts also focused on strengthening the rule of law, with regional prosecution centres established in Kenya and Seychelles as well as four new prisons constructed in Somalia under the Maritime Crime Programme of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
While these initiatives made piracy unattractive and led to a gradual reduction in the number of attacks, they did not address the root causes of piracy. Piracy in Somali emerged from the sense of exploitation arising from practices such as Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing in Somalian waters, a lack of political stability and extremely high youth unemployment. As long as these root causes are not sufficiently addressed, the threat of resurgence in piracy attacks in the Gulf of Aden will remain.
The majority of Somali pirate groups were made up of young unemployed men who saw piracy as a means to make a living. With the decline in piracy many young men are now turning to small scale fishing and related activities. However, their small fishing vessels cannot compete with the foreign fishing trawlers operating illegally along the coastline. Ironically, the decline in pirate attacks has been associated with an increase in IUU fishing along the Somali coast. When piracy was most prevalent, illegal fishers avoided Somali waters.
Foreign warships patrolling the Somali coastline should act not only as a military deterrent, but should also serve as coastguards for the Somali people. Operation ATALANTA’s mandate specifies, amongst other objectives, that it ‘monitors fishing activities off the coast of Somalia’ and ‘supports other EU missions and international organisations working to strengthen maritime security’. In view of this mandate and the limited resources available to the Somali government to equip and operate a functional coast guard and navy, Operation ATALANTA will need to play a greater role in supporting a wide range of maritime governance functions, including the monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) of fishing vessels operating in Somali waters.
Delegates from the Federal Government of Somalia, together with representatives from the semi-autonomous regions of Galmudug, Puntland and Somaliland came together in September 2013 to draw up the Somalia Maritime Resource and Security Strategy (SMRSS). The SMRSS presents a common maritime vision and goal to the international community, with due consideration to the different developmental stages of the regions. There is a need for all members of the international community that assisted in the development of this strategy to continue offering support for its implementation.
In June 2014 Somalia officially declared its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), in accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This declaration gives Somalia internationally recognised authority over its offshore waters. It furthers requires that all fishing vessels wishing to operate in Somali waters must obtain a license from the Somali government. Additionally, in December 2014 the Federal Somali Fisheries Law was adopted. While these initiatives establish the legal basis for fisheries governance in Somali waters, it does not solve the problem of IUU fishing as the country still lacks the requisite capabilities to effectively carry out MCS activities in its maritime domain. Furthermore, Somalia lacks key technologies and institutional structures such as a Fisheries Monitoring Center, a Vessel Monitoring System or an Automatic Identification System (AIS). Finally, some of the fishing vessels do not call at Somali ports and thus cannot be inspected by local port inspectors. Somalia is being provided with some AIS data by its international partners, which allows it to identify and track the activities of some fishing vessels within its EEZ. However, an AIS alone is not an effective monitoring system: vessels can easily turn off their AIS transponder and some vessels are not equipped with the device. It is however hoped that with the recognition of its EEZ, Somalia can now be included in regional MCS efforts.
The need to build the capacity of the Somali coast guard and navy is imperative. The international navies presently patrolling the Somali coast could engage the national navy and coast guard in exercises to ensure support skills acquisition and experience sharing. The national navy and coast guard should also be included in regional naval exercises to enhance their capacities.
Somalia through its membership of the International Monitoring Control and Surveillance Network receives training for its MCS officials on how to improve their effectiveness and enhance their skills as they combat IUU. The Somali Fisheries Working Group has also been supporting the development of local skills in fisheries management, especially in MCS functions. The working group is also expected to assist the Federal government in establishing a Somali Federal Fisheries Authority and a Fisheries Monitoring and Control Centre.
The success of regional counter-piracy efforts, unfortunately, is no guarantee against the future resurgence of piracy activities. The most effective solution to piracy in the Gulf of Aden is to support the political and socio-economic development of Somalia. Until this is achieved, there is an urgent need for international efforts to go beyond traditional maritime security concerns to include issues such as environmental and fisheries crime.